Talk to NEXT PT

Results

What changes when the conversation leaves the technology room

We work on sensitive government matters. No case identifies a body, a contract or a figure: what we publish is the movement, because that is what transfers from one organisation to another.

Cases are described with authorisation and without any element that would allow identification. Public indicators are cited only where already officially released by the institutions themselves.

Case 01

From mid-table to leading on digital service quality

Type of organisation
Federal regulatory agency
Profile
More than a thousand staff · national remit

Context

The organisation had digitised services and still sat in the bottom half of the federal service quality ranking. The cause was not technical: the initiatives existed, but each area measured success by its own criterion and none of them was the user's experience.

The movement

  • Citizen experience defined as the single prioritisation criterion, formalised in strategy.
  • A transformation core constituted with policy representation, not only technical.
  • An institutional event giving visibility to those already delivering.
  • A committee ritual with a prioritisation dashboard and periodic portfolio review.

Result

Leading
First place in the federal user satisfaction assessment.
+60 places
The rise in the digital services ranking against the starting point.
Ritual in place
Governance sustained by the organisation itself after the cycle.

The lesson

The ranking changed when the criterion changed. No new technology was bought to leave mid-table: it was decided, in a formal body, what would count as success.

Case 02

A training programme that became institutional strategy

Type of organisation
Federal promotion agency
Profile
Lean structure · international remit

Context

The initial request was for a course. In the first conversation it became clear that the leadership team held correct but non-converging views of what digital transformation was. Each directorate defended a valid slice and the whole did not form a direction.

The movement

  • The delivery was inverted: before the course, a conceptual alignment session with the core.
  • A shared language built across technology, strategy, people, policy and communications.
  • The policy leader trained to qualify how demand is framed.
  • Subsequent initiatives sequenced from the agreed vision, not from a course catalogue.

Result

A single view
The core aligned around one shared reading of digital transformation.
Qualified demand
The policy area now brings a problem rather than a specification.
A sequenced programme
Procurement evolved from an isolated course into a track with a logic.

The lesson

Isolated training does not change an organisation. What changes it is the sequence: align the core, train the decision-makers, and only then scale to the base.

Case 03

The diagnostic that prevented the wrong AI purchase

Type of organisation
Federal infrastructure body
Profile
Critical operation · heavy supplier dependency

Context

The institution was considering buying an AI platform to solve what it described as slow delivery. The diagnostic showed the stated problem was a symptom: there was no contracted corporate model, no usage policy and no data governance. Buying a tool at that stage would have created cost without the capacity to use it.

The movement

  • An adoption X-Ray applied to the workforce, cut between managers and non-managers.
  • Informal use of tools outside the institutional perimeter mapped.
  • Use cases prioritised by value, risk and data prerequisite.
  • Sequencing agreed: policy and data before platform.

Result

Purchase deferred
Procurement repositioned to follow the prerequisites, with scope redefined.
Risk addressed
Informal use mapped and brought inside an institutional rule.
A queue with criteria
Use cases ordered by evidence, not by stated urgency.

The lesson

The cheapest diagnostic in the programme tends to be the one that prevents the most expensive contract.

External evidence

under 50%

OECDDigital Government Index 2023

of countries have a formal requirement or a government-wide initiative to involve citizens and businesses in co-creating public services, even though almost all recognise how important it is.

The distance between recognising and institutionalising is exactly the space the design workshops and the committee occupy.

Your case is not here yet.

Tell us your organisation's context and the moment it is in. We reply with a reading of what usually sits behind that symptom, and where it tends to make sense to begin.